TL;DR
Get gifts for the two of you delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A Bolde article describes seven everyday phrases that it interprets as possible signs of confidence returning after a difficult period. The source presents these as illustrative cues, not a validated test, and the supplied material ends before all seven phrases and supporting details are available.
Bolde has published an article arguing that everyday phrases such as “I can figure it out” and “Let me think about it” may reflect confidence returning after a difficult period. The piece offers a personal-development interpretation of ordinary language, not a clinical assessment; the source material provided here does not include the complete list of seven phrases.
The article frames confidence as something that can return gradually through small changes in how people respond to problems and requests. Its examples include “That’s not for me”, presented as a way to decline an unwanted commitment without an extended apology, and “I changed my mind”, described as an ability to revise a decision when circumstances or understanding change.
Bolde also identifies “I’ve been through worse” as a phrase that may draw on memories of surviving adversity. The article quotes psychotherapist Jason N. Linder as saying, “We don’t know what we’re capable of until we’re tested.” It attributes to him a claim that research finds up to 70 percent of people who experience significant adversity report positive change in at least one area of life. The supplied material does not identify the study, its methods, or the population behind that figure.
The source excerpt begins describing a sixth phrase, “I don’t know yet”, as a departure from guessing or avoiding a question. It cuts off before explaining the point fully and does not provide the seventh phrase. Bolde also attributes comments about self-efficacy and resilience to psychologist Noam Shpancer of Otterbein University, and comments about cognitive flexibility to researcher Lindsey Godwin of Case Western Reserve University. The underlying research references are not included in the supplied text.
Everyday Language, Not a Confidence Test
The article may resonate with readers because it describes confidence as practical behavior rather than a dramatic feeling: taking time before agreeing, setting a boundary, or adapting a plan. Those examples can give readers language for reflecting on changes in their own choices, especially after stress or hardship.
But a phrase alone cannot establish that someone’s confidence is recovering. People may say “I can figure it out” for many reasons, and a person who is struggling may still set boundaries or change their mind. The article is best read as an informal set of possible signals, not as psychological guidance that can diagnose a person’s emotional state.
Products Worth Considering
Oral-B iO Series 3 Rechargeable Electric Toothbrush for Adults, Black, 3 Modes, 2 Brush Heads and Travel Case
Philips Sonicare 6500 Series Rechargeable Electric Toothbrush with 2 Brush Heads, White
Withings Body Smart Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Body Composition Scale
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The Article’s Psychology References
Bolde connects its examples to concepts including self-efficacy, the belief that one can take actions to meet a challenge, and cognitive flexibility, the ability to adjust thinking or decisions. It says recalling a past experience of competence can ease distress and describes revising a decision as potentially reflecting growth rather than inconsistency.
Those ideas are attributed in the article to Shpancer and Godwin, but the supplied source does not provide titles, publication dates, or links to the cited research. The claims therefore cannot be checked in detail from the material available for this report. The article’s discussion of adversity and positive change is likewise not enough, on its own, to establish that hardship typically leads to growth.
““We don’t know what we’re capable of until we’re tested.””
— Jason N. Linder, described by Bolde as a psychotherapist
The Missing Phrases and Evidence
The material supplied for this article ends midway through the discussion of “I don’t know yet”. It does not reveal the rest of that explanation or the seventh phrase, so the full list cannot be reported from the available text. The source also gives no publication date.
It is unclear which studies support the article’s claims about competence, flexibility, and post-traumatic growth. In particular, the stated figure of up to 70 percent lacks a named study, sample, timeframe, and definition of positive change in the excerpt. The figure should be treated as a claim attributed by Bolde to Linder, not as a finding independently established here.
What a Full Source Could Clarify
The complete Bolde article would be needed to verify the remaining phrase, finish the sixth example, and review the full set of attributions. The source material provided does not announce a follow-up, study, or expert review, so no further development can be confirmed.
Readers interested in the psychology behind the claims can look for the research or original writings cited by Shpancer, Godwin, and Linder, then check whether those sources support the specific conclusions Bolde draws. For now, the seven phrases are presented as reflective examples rather than a validated measure of confidence.
Key Questions
What phrases does the supplied article excerpt identify?
It names “I can figure it out,” “That’s not for me,” “I changed my mind,” “Let me think about it,” “I’ve been through worse,” and “I don’t know yet.” The excerpt cuts off before the sixth explanation is complete and does not include the seventh phrase.
Does using one of these phrases prove confidence is returning?
No. Bolde presents the phrases as possible signs or examples, not as a validated psychological test. A person’s confidence cannot be determined from a single expression alone.
What does Bolde say about surviving adversity?
The article interprets “I’ve been through worse” as a reminder of past resilience and attributes a claim about positive change after adversity to psychotherapist Jason N. Linder. The supplied excerpt does not identify the research behind the reported figure.
Can the research cited in the article be verified from the supplied material?
Not in detail. The excerpt names Noam Shpancer, Lindsey Godwin, and Jason N. Linder, but does not provide full citations or enough study information to check the claims independently.
Source: bolde.com
